Identify the occupations your regional projects share.

RES example · Richardson, Texas

Use the project-demand step of the Regional Evaluation System (RES) to compare estimated workforce needs across two employer projects. Identify shared occupations to focus training and workforce planning. These estimates do not measure available workers.

How RES estimates workforce needsSee the full platform

Richardson, Texas

Published RES example · Public sources

Example reviewed Sep 6, 2026 · Staffing data: 2025-05

A dated comparison of published announcements and industry staffing patterns. These are planning estimates, not current vacancies or confirmed employer occupation lists.

Shared occupations
87
Announced jobs used in this model
≈3,300
Published sources
4

Compare the projects shaping workforce demand.

Employer records are kept separate. Cumulative announcements are not presented as current vacancies.

Public announcementJun 17, 2026

Celestica Inc.

2801 Telecom Parkway, Richardson, Texas

Announced jobs used in this model
≈2,300
Hiring window
24 months following the latest applicable announcement
Industry used for occupation estimates
NAICS 3344

Approximately 2,300 new permanent positions are used. Retained positions are excluded from hiring demand.

Public announcementJan 15, 2026

GEICO

Three buildings in Richardson, Texas

Announced jobs used in this model
1,000
Hiring window
24 months following the latest applicable announcement
Industry used for occupation estimates
NAICS 524120

The latest 1,000-position increment is used for forward-looking overlap. It is already included in the 2,500 cumulative announcement.

Identify shared workforce needs across projects.

This is a demand-side model. It does not measure local workers, graduates, availability, skill match or willingness to commute.

Shared occupations ranked by combined modeled jobs
SOCOccupationCelestica modelGEICO modelCombined
15-1252Software Developers11934153
17-2112Industrial Engineers1210121
51-9061Inspectors, Testers, Sorters, Samplers, and Weighers1040104
11-1021General and Operations Managers373067
43-4051Customer Service Representatives125163
11-3031Financial Managers123547
11-9041Architectural and Engineering Managers46147
11-3021Computer and Information Systems Managers271542
13-2011Accountants and Auditors211940
13-1082Project Management Specialists26733
43-5071Shipping, Receiving, and Inventory Clerks32032
13-1111Management Analysts52530
43-1011First-Line Supervisors of Office and Administrative Support Workers102030
49-9071Maintenance and Repair Workers, General27229
13-1161Market Research Analysts and Marketing Specialists141428

Showing 15 of 87 shared occupations, ranked by combined modeled jobs. Rounding occurs at the project-by-occupation level. A shared occupation can round to zero jobs in either project.

How RES estimates project workforce needs.

BLS OEWS national industry staffing-share model

About these estimates. National OEWS industry staffing patterns provide a reproducible baseline. They do not provide a Richardson employer hiring plan or metro-by-industry estimate, and they do not capture each employer’s technology, outsourcing, shifts, wages or local recruiting strategy.

Industry 334400: published occupation rows cover 95.7% of industry employment. The remaining 4.3% is not allocated to occupations in this example.

Industry 524120: published occupation rows cover 98.5% of industry employment. The remaining 1.5% is not allocated to occupations in this example.

  1. 01

    Confirm whether each published headcount represents new jobs, retained jobs or total employment.

  2. 02

    Record the analyst-assigned employer NAICS separately from the staffing proxy. Celestica's stored 3344 proxy resolves to OEWS industry code 334400; GEICO uses 524120 for both.

  3. 03

    Verify the OEWS denominator, loaded share, residual share, official extraction URL and shared source vintage before any occupation result is published.

  4. 04

    Multiply forward-looking new positions by the national OEWS industry staffing share for each SOC occupation and round to the nearest whole position.

  5. 05

    Compare occupations present in both forward-looking project models. Do not treat the result as an employer hiring plan or filled-vacancy count.

What still needs to be confirmed for this region.

  • Neither employer has published an occupation-by-occupation hiring plan. The occupation counts remain modeled until an employer or Richardson staff verifies them.
  • Neither employer publishes a filled-to-date count for these commitments, so cumulative announcements must not be read as current vacancies.
  • GEICO describes the cumulative 2,500-job program as North Texas. Its latest 1,000-position increment is tied to three Richardson buildings.
  • GEICO has not published a retained-job figure, so total affected positions across both employers cannot be calculated without assuming zero.
  • The public data does not identify how many hires will come from currently employed workers, unemployed workers, in-migration or training programs.
  • Drive-time labor supply by occupation is not yet available in the current Richardson source set, so this page does not claim a worker-availability ratio.

Data sources and when they were updated.